Licensed Child Care Center · Houston, TX 77025
Between Oct 20, 2021 and Oct 20, 2026, the state cited YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA for 29 deficiencies — the Texas HHSC term for rule violations — over 19 routine inspections and 7 other visits (investigations or paperwork reviews); 22 were under rules the state weights High. The rule cited most often here is 744.1205 (9 times, most recently Aug 19, 2026).
The state lists YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA as serving school-age children, open 07:00 AM to 06:30 PM (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri). Programs on file: School Age Care, After School Care, Snacks Provided, Skill Classes, Part Time Care, Transportation to/from School, Field Trips. Program type: School Age Program.
Of the 29 violations at YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA, 22 fall under rules Texas weights High and 7 under Medium High; the state sets each rule’s weight by the risk a violation poses to children. How weights work
| Weight | Violations | Share |
|---|---|---|
| High | 22 | 76% |
| Medium High | 7 | 24% |
| Medium | 0 | 0% |
| Medium Low | 0 | 0% |
| Low | 0 | 0% |
YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA had 29 violations in five years, more than the median of 11 across Houston’s 923 licensed child care centers, and 0.8 per routine inspection against a median of 1.0 — a count of state records, not a rating.
7 rules were cited more than once at YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA in the last five years.
| Rule | Times | What the rule covers |
|---|---|---|
| 744.1205 High | 9 | Each caregiver must know which children they are responsible for, how many there are, and each child's name and age. The caregiver must stay close enough to see or hear what each child is doing, as the situation calls for, and be able to step in when needed. Official rule text · rule revised March 2023 Most recent: Aug 19, 2026 · first: Jan 26, 2023 |
| 745.641 High | 5 | An operation must get notice from the state's background check unit that a person is eligible, eligible with conditions, or provisionally eligible with conditions before letting that person be at the operation. While waiting, the person may attend orientation or pre-service training only if they have no contact with children in care. Official rule text Most recent: Sep 4, 2026 · first: Mar 18, 2024 |
| 744.3805 High | 4 | AP Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - No Child Unattended Most recent: Apr 24, 2024 · first: Jan 26, 2023 |
| 744.1201 High | 3 | AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers - Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected. or Exploited Most recent: Dec 23, 2025 · first: Jan 26, 2023 |
| 744.2105 High | 2 | Prohibited Punishments - Grabbing or pulling Most recent: Dec 23, 2025 · first: Dec 23, 2025 |
| 744.3501 Medium High | 2 | The program must have a fire inspection by a state or local fire marshal before its first permit is issued and at least once every 12 months. Programs in public school buildings run by the local school district are exempt, and if no inspection is available the program must get written proof of that from a fire marshal or county judge. Official rule text Most recent: Aug 6, 2025 · first: May 5, 2025 |
| 744.3503 Medium High | 2 | Documentation of Fire Inspection Most recent: Apr 25, 2023 · first: Mar 28, 2023 |
| Year | Routine inspections | All state visits | Violations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 (from Oct 20) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 2024 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 2025 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 2026 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
26 visits on record since Oct 20, 2021, newest first, including visits that found nothing.
| Date | Type | Rules checked | Violations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | Inspection | 1 | None |
| Sep 4, 2026 | Inspection | 7 | 1 |
| Aug 19, 2026 | Inspection | 7 | 7 |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Inspection | — | None |
| Jul 21, 2026 | Investigation (self-report) | 1 | None |
| May 5, 2026 | Inspection | 371 | None |
| Feb 12, 2026 | Inspection | 1 | None |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Inspection | 3 | 1 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | Inspection | 1 | 1 |
| Dec 26, 2025 | Inspection | — | None |
| Dec 23, 2025 | Investigation (report) | 5 | 3 |
| Aug 6, 2025 | Assessment | 1 | 1 |
| Date | Type | Rules checked | Violations |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2025 | Inspection | 106 | 1 |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Inspection | 1 | None |
| Jun 12, 2024 | Inspection | 5 | None |
| Jun 12, 2024 | Inspection | 629 | 1 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | Investigation (report) | 5 | 5 |
| Apr 8, 2024 | Inspection | 1 | None |
| Mar 27, 2024 | Inspection | 2 | 1 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | Inspection | 428 | 1 |
| Apr 25, 2023 | Assessment | 1 | 1 |
| Mar 28, 2023 | Inspection | 143 | 1 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | Investigation (report) | 6 | 4 |
| Aug 8, 2022 | Inspection | — | None |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Investigation (report) | 2 | None |
| May 9, 2022 | Inspection | 513 | None |
One rule cited at YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA changed after some of these citations (marked “rule revised”), so the wording that applied at the time may differ from our plain-English explanation.
High · Sep 4, 2026 · Inspection
3 caregivers were observed to be present and in care of children without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit (CBCU)
Plain-English explanation above
High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
During the inspection, children were observed rough playing, one child was observed punching another child in the private area, another child was observed holding a child against the wall and holding their hand around the child's neck. The child was in against the wall for approximately 20-30 seconds before a caregiver came to intervene. Children were also observed running back and forth between two rooms, sitting and climbing on furniture, with little to no intervention from the caregivers present.
Plain-English explanation above
Medium High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
During the inspection, there were several times were one or two caregivers were observed to be supervising 40-49 children, exceeding the ratio for children 6-13yrs of 1 caregiver to 26 children and max group ratio of 2 caregivers to 35 children.
Official text of rule 744.1601
Medium High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
The operation failed to notify CCR of a change to the program director within 5 days of the change in director.
In plain English: The program must tell the state in writing within five days when its designee, the head of its governing body, their address, or a director changes. Official rule text
High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
4 caregivers were observed to be present and in care of children without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit (CBCU)
Plain-English explanation above
High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
During the inspection, caregivers were observed walking out of the classroom multiple times leaving children unsupervised. At one point of the inspection, there were no caregivers in either room. One caregiver was observed to stand in a doorway to observe two groups.
Plain-English explanation above
Medium High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
The caregivers were not aware of the ages of children present. One caregiver stated they do not go by ages but by grade level and that the children should be between 5-11 or 12yrs old. A second caregiver stated they did not know because they were a substitute. There was only information available for the children from one school. According to the caregiver in charge, the driver had the other rosters for a pick-up run.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Aug 19, 2026 · Inspection
Staff present were not aware of the number of children in care. One caregiver stated they believed there were around 45 children present, another caregiver stated they believed there were 39 present. None of the staff attempted to count the children to verify the count. CCR requested all children be grouped in one area to verify the number of children present. 49 children were counted.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Jan 30, 2026 · Inspection
A caregiver was not aware of the number of children in their care. The caregiver stated there were 18 children in the group including a small group who went to the restroom. A total of 21 children were observed including 10 children who were escorted to the restroom. The caregiver was asked to count again to verify the number of children in their care. The caregiver then counted and stated there were 10 children in their care and remainder went to the restroom giving the group a total of 18. The caregiver was informed they were still incorrect and that there were 11 children in their care, in addition to the group who went to the restroom. The caregiver was informed that there was a total of 21 children in the group.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Jan 13, 2026 · Inspection
The caregiver was not aware of the number of children in their care. They ststed there were 16 children present. The group was counted by Child Care Regulation (CCR) multiple times and 21 children were observed to be present.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Dec 23, 2025 · Investigation (report)
During the course of the investigation, information obtained indicated that caregivers at the operation use a disciplinary practice in which all children are required to sit down, place their heads down, and have the classroom lights turned off when one child is misbehaving.
Official text of rule 744.2105
High · Dec 23, 2025 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, there is sufficient information to support two caregivers inappropriately grabbed a child having a tantrum by the wrist and shoulders in an attempt to restrain them.
Official text of rule 744.2105
High · Dec 23, 2025 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, there is sufficient information to support a caregiver failed to use good judgement when they yelled and use profane language in the presence of children.
Official text of rule 744.1201
Medium High · Aug 6, 2025 · Assessment
Operation does not have a current fire marshal inspection.
Plain-English explanation above
Medium High · May 5, 2025 · Inspection
There was not an updated inspection report available for licensing to review.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Jun 12, 2024 · Inspection
Two caregivers that was counted in the child care ratio was present with a pending/inactive background check.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Apr 24, 2024 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained in the DFPS investigation, caregivers were not aware of all children in their care. Caregivers were not aware of the child's absence until the parent arrived for pick-up.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Apr 24, 2024 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained from the DFPS investigation, a child was left unsupervised in the van for over 2 hours.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Apr 24, 2024 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, a caregiver failed to account for all children or check off a roster list.
Official text of rule 744.3805
High · Apr 24, 2024 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained from the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient information to support neglectful supervision of a child who was left in a van.
Official text of rule 744.1201
High · Apr 24, 2024 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, the caregiver failed to follow the operation's transportation procedures by checking the van for any children or belongings resulting in the child being left in the vehicle for over 2 hours.
Official text of rule 744.3805
High · Mar 27, 2024 · Inspection
During the follow up a caregiver with an inactive background check was still present at the operation.
Plain-English explanation above
High · Mar 18, 2024 · Inspection
A caregiver was counted in the child caregiver ratio with an inactive background check status.
Plain-English explanation above
Medium High · Apr 25, 2023 · Assessment
Documentation not available for review.
Official text of rule 744.3503
Medium High · Mar 28, 2023 · Inspection
Doucmentation of the most recent fire inspection was not available for review.
Official text of rule 744.3503
High · Jan 26, 2023 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, the sign-in/out log did not accurately account for the children that were removed from the van and in the classroom.
Official text of rule 744.3805
High · Jan 26, 2023 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained from the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient information to support neglectful supervision of a child who was left in a van.
Official text of rule 744.1201
High · Jan 26, 2023 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, the caregiver failed to follow the operation's transportation procedures by checking the van for any children or belongings resulting in the child being left in the vehicle for approx. 1.5 hours.
Official text of rule 744.3805
High · Jan 26, 2023 · Investigation (report)
Based on the information obtained in the DFPS investigation, caregivers were not aware of all children in their care. Caregivers were not aware of the child's absence until the parent arrived for pick-up.
Plain-English explanation above · rule revised March 2023
Based on the kinds of rules cited at YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA:
More in ZIP 77025 and all of Houston.
This page reports the state’s records for YMCA Afterschool @ Weekley YMCA; it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a background check, and may not be used for employment, tenant, credit, or insurance decisions.
Explanations follow the current rules (HHSC minimum standards, revised December 2025).